From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pont v. Stowitzky

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-0147 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-0147.

September 17, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2008, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Linda K. Caracappa and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas is DENIED with prejudice; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Pont v. Stowitzky

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-0147 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Pont v. Stowitzky

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. DU PONT, Petitioner, v. PAUL STOWITZKY, ET AL., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 17, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-0147 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Mahally

rule is not a procedural requirement, it does not trigger the procedural default doctrine on habeas…