From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponder v. Ishman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
May 31, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-74 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. May. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13-CV-74 (CDL)

05-31-2013

LEONARD PONDER, Plaintiff, v. WENDY ISHMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge on May 6, 2013 is hereby approved, adopted, and made the Order of the Court. The objections of the Plaintiff have been considered and are found to be without merit. Plaintiff's claims against Paul Morris are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Wendy Ishman may proceed.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 31st day of May, 2013.

______________________

CLAY D. LAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ponder v. Ishman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
May 31, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-74 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. May. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Ponder v. Ishman

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD PONDER, Plaintiff, v. WENDY ISHMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13-CV-74 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. May. 31, 2013)