Pond v. Torrey

1 Citing case

  1. Commonwealth v. Newton

    186 Mass. 286 (Mass. 1904)   Cited 3 times
    In Commonwealth v. Newton, 186 Mass. 286, 291, the issue raised in the second case was not raised or considered in the first case between the codefendants therein.

    State Bank v. Bartle, 114 Mo. 276. Powers v. Chelsea Savings Bank, 129 Mass. 44, and Torrey v. Pond, 102 Mass. 355, relied on by the city, were cases in the nature of bills of interpleader, where the rights between the several defendants were put in issue. The tire company also has set up the defence that the Commonwealth has not complied with the decree of March 5, 1903, because it "has not opened up the East Branch and put it in its original condition, but, on the contrary, has simply reproduced the artificial conditions of the raceway as it existed appurtenant to a mill."