From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pomilio v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

In Pomilio v Crosson (199 A.D.2d 1052 [decided herewith]), however, Supreme Court, Oneida County, concluded that a rational basis exists for the salary disparity between plaintiffs and their counterparts in Erie and Monroe Counties.

Summary of this case from Barth v. Crosson

Opinion

December 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with same Memorandum as in Barth v Crosson ( 199 A.D.2d 1050 [decided herewith]).


Summaries of

Pomilio v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

In Pomilio v Crosson (199 A.D.2d 1052 [decided herewith]), however, Supreme Court, Oneida County, concluded that a rational basis exists for the salary disparity between plaintiffs and their counterparts in Erie and Monroe Counties.

Summary of this case from Barth v. Crosson
Case details for

Pomilio v. Crosson

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY K. POMILIO et al., Appellants, v. MATTHEW T. CROSSON, as Chief…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Barth v. Crosson

In Barth v Crosson, Supreme Court, Onondaga County, granted judgment declaring that the statutory provisions…

Barr v. Crosson

In Barth, the Appellate Division affirmed a lower court decision that awarded post-judgment interest only but…