From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pomerantz v. Clearview Gardens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 1980
77 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 28, 1980


Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 11, 1980, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff's complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff, the owner of a co-operative apartment, agreed to pay defendant, a co-operative corporation, 60% of the price at which she sold her stock, in consideration of defendant's waiver of its option to purchase said stock. The stock was sold for $12,000. Plaintiff now contends that that agreement violated the common-law rule against restraints upon alienation and was unconscionable. The rule against restraints upon alienation applies to estates in fee (see Wiesenthal v. Young, 280 App. Div. 590) and does not apply to the shares in this co-operative corporation (see McCorkle Coop. Apts. v. Gross, 54 A.D.2d 753, affd 43 N.Y.2d 765; see, also, Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp., 2 N.Y.2d 534). Nor has plaintiff pointed to any facts which would render the agreement unconscionable. Therefore, Special Term properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. Damiani, J.P., Gibbons, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pomerantz v. Clearview Gardens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 1980
77 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Pomerantz v. Clearview Gardens

Case Details

Full title:LEATRICE POMERANTZ, as Administratrix of the Estate of ETHEL ROSEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 28, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)