From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polymer80, Inc. v. Glock, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 24, 2022
3:20-cv-00617-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00617-MMD-CLB

01-24-2022

POLYMER80, INC., Plaintiff, v. GLOCK, INC.; and, LIPSEY'S LLC, Defendants.

JOHN R. FUNK, ESQ. Luke A. Walker, Esq. GUNDERSON LAW FIRM EDMUND J. FERDINAND, III, ESQ. (Admitted pro hac vice) ALEXANDER MALBIN, ESQ. (Admitted pro hac vice) JOHN F. OLSEN, ESQ. (Admitted pro hac vice) FERDINAND IP LAW GROUP


JOHN R. FUNK, ESQ.

Luke A. Walker, Esq.

GUNDERSON LAW FIRM

EDMUND J. FERDINAND, III, ESQ.

(Admitted pro hac vice)

ALEXANDER MALBIN, ESQ.

(Admitted pro hac vice)

JOHN F. OLSEN, ESQ.

(Admitted pro hac vice)

FERDINAND IP LAW GROUP

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

Counsel for Plaintiff, Polymer 80, Inc.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Local Rule of Practice 11-6 this Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel is being submitted to inform the Court, the parties, and counsel that DIANE T. GORCZYCA, ESQ. is no longer associated with the law firm FERDINAND IP LAW GROUP effective January 21, 2022. The other attorneys from Ferdinand IP Law Group and Gunderson Law Firm listed below will continue to serve as counsel for Plaintiff, Polymer80, Inc. on the matter.

Accordingly, the undersigned respectfully requests that the Clerk remove Ms. Gorc2yca's name as counsel for this case number.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Polymer80, Inc. v. Glock, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 24, 2022
3:20-cv-00617-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Polymer80, Inc. v. Glock, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:POLYMER80, INC., Plaintiff, v. GLOCK, INC.; and, LIPSEY'S LLC, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00617-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2022)