From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polygon US Corp. v. Diversified Info. Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0923 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0923

10-31-2012

POLYGON US CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES f/k/a DIVERSIFIED RECORDS SERVICES, INC., Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 31st day of October, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Diversified Information Technologies f/k/a Diversified Records Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) is DENIED. Defendant Diversified Information Technologies f/k/a Diversified Records Services, Inc. shall file an answer to Polygon US Corporation's Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order.

________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Polygon US Corp. v. Diversified Info. Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0923 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Polygon US Corp. v. Diversified Info. Techs.

Case Details

Full title:POLYGON US CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0923 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2012)

Citing Cases

Yulek Steven Dec v. McLean

Similar to the other bases for dismissal, the court must accept the truth of the allegations in the complaint…

Reschenthaler v. Schmidt

As with the other bases for dismissal, the court must accept the truth of the allegations in the complaint…