From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 1985
466 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-2314.

April 3, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Cathleen Brady, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

LETTS, J., concurs specially with opinion.


I do not think the improprieties of the prosecutor rose to the level of fundamental error here so I am in agreement with the result. Nonetheless, the prosecutor's behavior was improper. Any kid out of law school knows that a prosecutor should not, in closing argument, tell a jury that he did not know if he "could live with himself" if the jury found the defendant not guilty.

For such a statement, he needs his professional ears boxed.


Summaries of

Poly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 1985
466 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Poly v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELIUS POLY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 3, 1985

Citations

466 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Poly v. State

I write because, in my view, the special concurrence by a panelist to the per curiam affirmance in the direct…