From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poltl v. Caracciolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1923
205 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

February, 1923.


Judgment reversed on the law and in the exercise of our discretion, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the amendment to the answer, sought by the defense, should have been allowed. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 166.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Poltl v. Caracciolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1923
205 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Poltl v. Caracciolo

Case Details

Full title:FERDINAND POLTL, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CARACCIOLO and ANDREW M. O'CONNOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1923

Citations

205 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)