Pollock v. Dep't of Revenue

Full title: ANTHONY POLLOCK, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LATISHA LAWANDA…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 14, 2020

300 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-1664

02-14-2020

Anthony POLLOCK, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Latisha Lawanda Brockington, Appellees.

Anthony Pollock, II, South Daytona, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of Revenue. No Appearance for Other Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Pollock, II, South Daytona, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of Revenue.

No Appearance for Other Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the ... judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").

COHEN, LAMBERT, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.