From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollock v. Bateman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 6, 2016
No. 22 MM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2016)

Opinion

No. 22 MM 2016

04-06-2016

MARIO POLLOCK, Petitioner v. HON. WALLANCE H. BATEMAN, JR., Respondent


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint in Mandamus is DENIED, and the Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Pollock v. Bateman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 6, 2016
No. 22 MM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Pollock v. Bateman

Case Details

Full title:MARIO POLLOCK, Petitioner v. HON. WALLANCE H. BATEMAN, JR., Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 6, 2016

Citations

No. 22 MM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2016)