From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 28, 1991
581 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding convictions for crimes which are committed after the offense for which the defendant was being sentenced are improperly scored as prior record

Summary of this case from Ness v. State

Opinion

No. 88-00380.

June 28, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, R. Wallace Pack, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, Harry Pollis, challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon him after he was found guilty of attempted second degree murder, shooting into a building, and carrying a concealed weapon. We affirm the convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing.

We find no merit in the appellant's contentions that the trial court committed error in the conduct of his trial and, accordingly, affirm his convictions. We also find no merit in the appellant's contention that the trial court erred by including an uncounseled conviction on the guideline scoresheet. The appellant did not carry his burden on this issue. Croft v. State, 513 So.2d 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

We agree, however, with the appellant's contention that the scoresheet improperly scored two misdemeanor convictions as prior record. The appellant's scoresheet included points under prior record for two misdemeanor convictions based upon offenses which were committed after the primary offense for which appellant was being sentenced in this case. Convictions for crimes which are committed after the offense for which a defendant is being sentenced should not be scored as prior record. Thorp v. State, 555 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1990); Falzone v. State, 496 So.2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a). The deletion from the scoresheet of points for these two misdemeanors results in a lower sentence range. Since the sentence imposed by the trial court exceeds this range, we reverse and remand for resentencing after the preparation of a proper scoresheet.

Remanded for resentencing.

THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pollis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 28, 1991
581 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

holding convictions for crimes which are committed after the offense for which the defendant was being sentenced are improperly scored as prior record

Summary of this case from Ness v. State
Case details for

Pollis v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARRY POLLIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 28, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Sumpter v. State

However, we remand for re-sentencing. The scoresheet utilized by the trial court to sentence Sumpter…

Ness v. State

PER CURIAM. William J. Ness challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion to correct illegal…