Pollenex Servs., Inc. v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

1 Citing case

  1. S & R Med., P.C. v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 51013 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)   Cited 3 times

    Plaintiff's sole argument on appeal is that the Civil Court, upon denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, should have made findings, pursuant to CPLR 3212 (g), that plaintiff had established certain facts for all purposes in the action. As we decline plaintiff's request to limit the issues for trial (see CPLR 3212 [g]; Metropolitan Diagnostic Med. Care, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 47 Misc 3d 130[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50383[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]; Pollenex Servs., Inc. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 44 Misc 3d 126[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50953[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.