From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1651.

May 16, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Thomas M. Coker, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing the appellant as a habitual offender without making the requisite determination, pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), that an extended term of imprisonment is necessary for the protection of the public. The newly imposed sentence must be within the guidelines pursuant to Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pollard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Pollard v. State

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN POLLARD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Murray v. State

I thus disagree with our decision in King v. State, 580 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (en banc), in which we…

King v. State

Meehan v. State, 526 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We recede from Pollard v. State, 561 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th…