From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polkowski v. Polkowski

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 17, 2003
854 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-2817.

Opinion filed September 17, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Julie Koenig, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-3995 FMCE (38)(90).

Mitchell Haymes of Law Offices of Glantz Glantz, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Lynn G. Waxman of Lynn G. Waxman, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Steven L. Berzner of Steven L. Berzner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


The effect of state boundaries on a court's jurisdiction over property to be distributed in a dissolution proceeding frames the issue in this appeal. The husband challenges the final judgment dissolving his marriage and distributing the marital property. He raises two issues on appeal. First, the husband argues that the trial court lacked the authority to order the partition of the marital residence located in Plantation, Florida. Second, he argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order the sale of real property located in North Carolina. We reverse that portion of the final judgment ordering the sale of the North Carolina property and affirm in all other respects.

The final judgment provides, "The real property located in Murphy, North Carolina shall be sold and the net proceeds of the sale shall be equally divided by the parties." Like lines in the sand, state boundaries determine a court's jurisdiction over real property. In this case, the trial court lacked in rem jurisdiction over the North Carolina property. It erred in that portion of the final judgment ordering the partition and sale of the North Carolina property. See Pawlik v. Pawlik, 545 So.2d 506, 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); see also Sammons v. Sammons, 479 So.2d 223, 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Farley v. Farley, 790 So.2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

We therefore reverse the judgment in part and remand the case to the trial court. Upon remand, the court may reconsider the distribution of all marital assets in light of this opinion. See Pawlik, 545 So.2d at 507.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY, JJ., and CHAVIES, MICHAEL B., Associate Judge, concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Polkowski v. Polkowski

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 17, 2003
854 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Polkowski v. Polkowski

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS POLKOWSKI, Appellant, v. LAURIE POLKOWSKI, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 17, 2003

Citations

854 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Demello v. Buckman

We agree with DeMello that the court did not have the authority to order the sale of the property or impose a…

Brown v. Brown

The appellant primarily argues that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to direct the…