From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polk v. Besenaiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2842 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2842 LKK JFM (PC)

03-09-2012

MAURICE R. POLK, Plaintiff, v. C/O R. BESENAIZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed December 23, 2011, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period expired and plaintiff neither complied with the order nor requested an extension of time to do so. For that reason, on February 23, 2012, this court issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

On March 1, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Therein, plaintiff avers that he delivered the required forms to prison officials for mailing on January 13, 2012, and that he is pursuing administrative remedies within the prison to determine what happened to the forms.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2012 are vacated;

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a copy of the court's December 23, 2011 order, two USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed October 27, 2011.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
b. One completed summons;
c. One completed USM-285 form for whom the court determined in the December 23, 2011 order that service was appropriate; and
d. Three copies of the endorsed complaint filed October 27, 2011.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

5. Plaintiff's March 1, 2012 motion for extension of time is denied as unnecessary.

________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAURICE R. POLK, Plaintiff,

vs.

C/O R. BESENAIZ, et al., Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-2842 LKK JFM (PC)

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed ____ :

____ completed summons form
____ completed USM-285 forms
____ copies of the _________
Complaint

________________________

Plaintiff


Summaries of

Polk v. Besenaiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2842 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Polk v. Besenaiz

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE R. POLK, Plaintiff, v. C/O R. BESENAIZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2842 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2012)