From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polito v. DeTomaso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126. The plaintiff exhibited willful and contumacious conduct in failing to comply with repeated demands for disclosure and depositions (see, Zletz v. Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711, 713; Mills v Ducille, 170 A.D.2d 657). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart, and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Polito v. DeTomaso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Polito v. DeTomaso

Case Details

Full title:LYDIA POLITO, as Parent and Natural Guardian of JAMES POLITO, an Infant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 575

Citing Cases

Williams v. New Style Limousine, Inc.

Defendant Masih's failure was part of a pattern of "repeated neglect" rather than an "isolated, inadvertent…

Williams v. NEW LIMOUSINE

Defendant Masih's failure was part of a pattern of "`repeated neglect' rather than an `isolated, inadvertent…