Polaris Powerled Techs. v. Vizio, Inc.

Full title: POLARIS POWERLED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. VIZIO, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

No. 2020-2328 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2020-2328

08-31-2021

POLARIS POWERLED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. VIZIO, INC., Defendant-Appellee

RUSSELL TONKOVICH, Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP, Burlingame, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID ALBERTI, MARC BELLOLI, AIDAN BREWSTER, ELIZABETH DAY, ROBERT KRAMER, ROBERT Y. XIE. RICHARD W. ERWINE, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RAYMOND NIMROD.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:18-cv-01571-JVS-DFM, Judge James V. Selna.

RUSSELL TONKOVICH, Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP, Burlingame, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID ALBERTI, MARC BELLOLI, AIDAN BREWSTER, ELIZABETH DAY, ROBERT KRAMER, ROBERT Y. XIE.

RICHARD W. ERWINE, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RAYMOND NIMROD.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

DYK, O'MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.