From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pokladek v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 9, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-425 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 9, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-CV-425

09-09-2016

MICHAEL L. POKLADEK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Ray Kent's August 9, 2016 Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Court grant Defendants Krantz's and Sata's motion for summary judgment based on lack of exhaustion and grant the Michigan Department of Corrections's (MDOC) motion to dismiss based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. The Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff on August 9, 2016. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 26), filed August 9, 2016, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant MDOC's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Defendants Sata's and Krantz's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against the MDOC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Sata and Krantz are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: September 9, 2016

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pokladek v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 9, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-425 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Pokladek v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. POKLADEK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 9, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:15-CV-425 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 9, 2016)