From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poindexter v. Starbucks York Roasting Plant

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2024
Civil Action 1:21-CV-1847 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-1847

06-28-2024

TRISTEN MERCEDES POINDEXTER, Plaintiff v. STARBUCKS YORK ROASTING PLANT, Defendant


ORDER

William I. Arbuckle U.S. Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 34) is GRANTED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's Title VII disparate treatment and retaliation claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend.

(2) Plaintiff's Title VII retaliatory termination claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend, but without prejudice to refile as a separate action in the event Plaintiff properly exhausts her administrative remedies.

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Poindexter v. Starbucks York Roasting Plant

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2024
Civil Action 1:21-CV-1847 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Poindexter v. Starbucks York Roasting Plant

Case Details

Full title:TRISTEN MERCEDES POINDEXTER, Plaintiff v. STARBUCKS YORK ROASTING PLANT…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-1847 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)