From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

POHL v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
May 28, 2003
No. 04-03-00188-CR (Tex. App. May. 28, 2003)

Opinion

No. 04-03-00188-CR

Delivered and Filed: May 28, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas, Trial Court No. 1102, Honorable Brock Jones, Judge Presiding. DISMISSED AS MOOT

Sitting: Alma L. LOPEZ, Chief Justice, Catherine STONE, Justice, Paul W. GREEN, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court's order denying his request for the appointment of counsel in connection with an Article 64 DNA proceeding. After the notice of appeal was filed, the trial court vacated its order and issued a new order granting appellant's request for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Appellant's attorney responded that he has been appointed to represent appellant in relation to the Article 64 DNA proceeding but not in relation to this appeal. Based on the information contained in the clerk's record and confirmed by appellant's attorney, appellant has been appointed counsel in connection with his Article 64 DNA proceeding. As a result, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

POHL v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
May 28, 2003
No. 04-03-00188-CR (Tex. App. May. 28, 2003)
Case details for

POHL v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:Phillip Joseph POHL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: May 28, 2003

Citations

No. 04-03-00188-CR (Tex. App. May. 28, 2003)