From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pogue v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 12, 2009
CASE NO. 7:07-CR-00028 HL CASE NO. 7:07-CV-90009, 10, 11 HL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 12, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 7:07-CR-00028 HL 28 U.S.C. § 2255, CASE NO. 7:07-CV-90009, 10, 11 HL.

June 12, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Doc. 169), which recommends denying Petitioners' Motions to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered Petitioners' Objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the R R to which Petitioners object. After careful consideration, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

It appears from the Objections to Report and Recommendations (Docs. 170, 171, 172) that Plaintiffs' objections concern the amount of restitution. However, Petitioners "cannot utilize § 2255 to challenge [their] restitution". Mamone v. United States, 559 F.3d 1209, 1211 (11th Cir. 2009)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pogue v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 12, 2009
CASE NO. 7:07-CR-00028 HL CASE NO. 7:07-CV-90009, 10, 11 HL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Pogue v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JEAN POGUE, JOSEPH POGUE, and CASSANDRA MONTGOMERY, Petitioners, v. UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Jun 12, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 7:07-CR-00028 HL CASE NO. 7:07-CV-90009, 10, 11 HL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 12, 2009)