Poer v. Calder Race Course, Inc.

Full title: FRANK POER, et al., Petitioners, v. CALDER RACE COURSE, INC., Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 27, 2002

823 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2002)

Opinion

No. SC01-472

Opinion filed June 27, 2002.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict Third District — Case No. 3D00-524 (Dade County).

Edward R. Curtis of Curtis Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida; and Bruce Botsford, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioners.

Eric D. Isicoff and Teresa Ragatz of Isicoff Ragatz, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondent.

William R. Amlong of Amlong Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for The National Employment Lawyers Association, Florida Chapter, Amicus Curiae.

QUINCE, J.

We initially accepted for review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Poer v. Calder Race Course, Inc., 775 So.2d 970 (Fla.3d DCA 2000), based upon express and direct conflict with the decision of Fifth District Court of Appeal in All Pro Sports Camp, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 727 So.2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.