Opinion
No. 2014AP529.
2015-04-02
To repeat, Trust Point has the difficult task of balancing the potentially conflicting interests of two classes of beneficiaries, while pursuing Gerhard Poehling's desire that First Supply remain a trust asset. We agree with the circuit court that the evidence the Poehlings point to does not support a finding that Trust Point, during the time period that matters here, failed to strike a reasonable balance. We agree with the circuit court that no reasonable jury could find otherwise. We express no opinion on Trust Point's administration of the trust after April 2013.