From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

POE v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1928
116 So. 304 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

7 Div. 381.

March 27, 1928.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; R. B. Carr, Judge.

Nelson Poe was convicted of buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

D. Hardy Riddle, of Talladega, for appellant.

The testimony of the accomplice being the only testimony showing a connection between defendant and the crime, the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge, since there can be no conviction on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


The conviction of this appellant rested upon the evidence of the state witness White, an admitted accomplice in the crime charged. Aside from his evidence, there was no testimony in this case tending to connect this appellant with the commission of the offense charged. This rule of evidence is expressly provided by statute. Code 1923, § 5635. This question was raised in the lower court, and is properly presented and insisted upon here. It is conclusive of this appeal.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

POE v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1928
116 So. 304 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

POE v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:POE v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 27, 1928

Citations

116 So. 304 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
22 Ala. App. 396

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

A conviction for felony cannot stand on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Poe v. State, 22 Ala.…

Dailey v. State

Perkins v. State, supra. There was no sufficient corroboratory evidence in this case. White v. State, 72 Ala.…