Poe v. Self-He Fed. Credit Union

Full title: VERONICA POE, on behalf of herself and al others similarly situated…

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

1:21-CV-00938-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-CV-00938-DAD-SKO

09-30-2021

VERONICA POE, on behalf of herself and al others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SELF-HELP FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant.

Stuart M. Richter (SBN 126231) Andrew J. Demko (SBN 247320) KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant Self-Help Federal Credit Union

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Stuart M. Richter (SBN 126231)

Andrew J. Demko (SBN 247320)

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Self-Help Federal Credit Union

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT SELF-HELP FEDERAL CREDIT UNION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Doc. 9)

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Based on Defendant Self-Help Federal Credit Union (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Veronica Poe's (“Plaintiff”) stipulation, dated September 27, 2021, to extend the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to October 28, 2021, (Doc. 9), and having found good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

Defendant will have until October 28, 2021, to file its response to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.