From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poe v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 21, 2007
230 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-8030.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 21, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-01568-CMC).

Richard Keith Poe, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John Eric Kaufmann, McKay, Cauthen, Settana Stubley, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Richard Keith Poe appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Poe's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poe v. Ozmint, No. 0:05-cv-01568-CMC, 2006 WL 3489110 (D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Poe v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 21, 2007
230 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Poe v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:Richard Keith POE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT, Director, South…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 21, 2007

Citations

230 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2007)