POE v. JAIL

1 Citing case

  1. Hart v. Ferguson

    176 P. 396 (Okla. 1918)   Cited 5 times
    In Hart, however, this Court said that pursuant to Revised Laws of 1910, in such an action, possession of the lands and costs only could be recovered.

    "The judgment for the plaintiff in an action of forcible entry, or unlawful detainer, must be only for possession and cost." In Poe v. Bradley, 44 Ark. 500, it is said: "In an action for unlawful detainer where possession is delivered to the plaintiff under the writ, the only judgment he is entitled to is for cost. No damages are recoverable for detention of the premises."