Opinion
June 10, 1952.
Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Heffernan, JJ.
Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, on the ground that the delivery date allegedly agreed upon was not incorporated in the memorandum.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Podell v. Milton Millstein, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 1952
280 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Summaries of
Podell v. Milton Millstein, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 1952
280 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for
Podell v. Milton Millstein, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:HARRY PODELL et al., Partners Doing Business as HARENWILL WOOLEN CO.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 10, 1952
Citations
280 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)