Opinion
Argued October 19, 1926
Decided November 16, 1926
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Martin A. Schenck, Edward Cornell and Emily C. Holt for appellant.
Edgar J. Nathan and W. Calvin Chestnut for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground plaintiff's alleged loss was not covered by policy.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.