From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PNY Techs. Inc. v. Sandisk Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI)

11-15-2011

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Defendant.

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP John L. Cooper Attorneys for Plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Allen J. Ruby Attorneys for Defendant SanDisk Corporation


John L. Cooper (SBN 50324)

Roderick M. Thompson (SBN 96192)

Jessica K. Nall (SBN 215149)

Allyson M. Franco (SBN 273467)

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

Ira Gottlieb (pro hac vice)

Scott Christie (pro hac vice)

Jonathan Short (pro hac vice)

Richard Hernandez (pro hac vice)

Mark Anania (pro hac vice)

McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Allen J. Ruby (SBN 47109)

David W. Hansen (SBN 196958)

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &

FLOM LLP

James A. Keyte (pro hac vice application

forthcoming)

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &

FLOM LLP

Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice application

forthcoming)

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

SANDISK CORPORATION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

ON SANDISK CORPORATION'S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Dept: Courtroom 10, 19th Fl.

Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

Complaint Filed: September 21, 2011

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2011, Defendant SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk") filed a Motion to Dismiss ("Motion"), setting the hearing on SanDisk's Motion for December 16, 2011;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc. ("PNY") asked counsel for SanDisk to agree to an extension of the briefing and hearing schedule on the Motion, pursuant to which PNY's Opposition to the Motion would be due on December 7, 2011, and SanDisk having requested its reply be due December 21, 2011, and PNY therefore having asked that the hearing on the Motion be scheduled for January 6, 2012;

WHEREAS, SanDisk does not object to PNY's requested extension;

WHEREAS, the Court set the Initial Case Management Conference in this action for January 6, 2012, at 2:30 p.m.; and

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to propose an alternative briefing schedule for SanDisk's Motion, as well as an alternative date for hearing SanDisk's Motion on the same date as the Initial Case Management Conference;

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the Parties request that the Court reset the briefing schedule for SanDisk's Motion and the Hearing date for that Motion and the Initial Case Management Conference on the same date as set forth below or on such other dates as may be acceptable to the Court:

1. PNY's Opposition to SanDisk's Motion will be due on December 7, 2011;
2. SanDisk's Reply in Support of its Motion will be due on December 21, 2011; and
3. The Hearing on SanDisk's Motion will be January 13, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I represent that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

John L. Cooper

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PNY Technologies, Inc.

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &

FLOM LLP

Allen J. Ruby

Attorneys for Defendant

SanDisk Corporation

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON


Summaries of

PNY Techs. Inc. v. Sandisk Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

PNY Techs. Inc. v. Sandisk Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)