From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3768 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11 3768 JSC

11-18-2011

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC. Plaintiff v. CALIFORNIA FAIRS FINANCING AUTHORITY, et al Defendants

Hal Reiland (144240) Reiland/Law Attorney for Defendant California Fairs Financing Authority, A California Joint Powers Authority, 49th District Agricultural Association, A state institution of the State of California. LEO D. PLOTKIN LEVY, SMALL & LALLAS A Partnership Including Professional Corporations LEO D. PLOTKIN Attorneys for Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC HAL REILAND REILAND/LAW HAL REILAND Attorneys for Defendants California Fairs Financing Authority and 49th District Agricultural Association


Hal Reiland (144240)

Reiland/Law

Attorney for Defendant California Fairs Financing Authority, A California Joint Powers Authority, 49th District Agricultural Association, A state institution of the State of California.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE LLC, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(Local Rule 6-3)

Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley

Complaint Filed: August 1, 2011

Response Date: November 23, 2011

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC ("PNCEF") and Defendants California Fairs Financing Authority and the 49th District Agricultural Association (collectively, "Responding Parties") with reference to the following facts:

1. PNCEF filed a motion for Preliminary Injunction (the "Motion"), set for hearing on December 8, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

2. Under the Northern District Local Rules, opposition from Defendants is due on or about November 17, 2011 and any reply brief is due from Moving Parties on November 24, 2011 (excluding holidays).

3. Responding Parties require additional time to oppose the Motion, including time to finalize declarations with respect to certain evidentiary issues raised by the Motion.

4. If acceptable to the Court, Moving Parties are agreeable to allowing Responding Parties through and including November 23, 2011 to file its opposition to the Motion, with the deadline for any reply papers extended to November 30, 2011.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated as follows:

1. Responding Parties may have through and including November 23, 2011 to file opposition to the Motion.

2. Moving Parties may have through and including November 30, 2011 to file any reply papers in support of the Motion.

LEO D. PLOTKIN

LEVY, SMALL & LALLAS

A Partnership Including Professional

Corporations

LEO D. PLOTKIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PNC Equipment Finance, LLC

HAL REILAND

REILAND/LAW

HAL REILAND

Attorneys for Defendants

California Fairs Financing Authority and

49th District Agricultural Association

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Responding Parties may have through and including November 23, 2011 to file opposition to the Motion.

2. Moving Parties may have through and including November 30, 2011 to file any reply papers in support of the Motion.

Hon. Jacqueline Scott Coney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3768 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)
Case details for

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC. Plaintiff v. CALIFORNIA FAIRS FINANCING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11 3768 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)