The standard of review of a motion to dismiss is de novo. Bell v. Indian River Mem'l Hosp., 778 So.2d 1030, 1032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); see also PNC Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Inlet Vill. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 204 So.3d 97, 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ("The standard of review of ... an order dismissing a complaint with prejudice ... is de novo."). "When considering a motion to dismiss, trial courts are not permitted to `go beyond the four corners of the complaint in considering the legal sufficiency of the allegations.'"
"When considering a motion to dismiss, trial courts are not permitted to `go beyond the four corners of the complaint in considering the legal sufficiency of the allegations.'" PNC Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Inlet Vill. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 204 So.3d 97, 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoting Barbado v. Green & Murphy, P.A., 758 So.2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)). However, "[t]he issue of sovereign immunity may properly be considered on a motion to dismiss."