From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PMK Int. v. Malmgren

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 8, 2009
No. 09-09-00409-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00409-CV

Submitted on August 7, 2009.

Opinion Delivered October 8, 2009.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 06-08-07786-CV.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On September 10, 2009, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant did not reply to our correspondence. The trial court signed the judgment on May 12, 2009, and the appellate timetables were extended by the timely filing of post-judgment motions. Notice of appeal was due to be filed on August 10, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant filed notice of appeal on August 31, 2009, more than 90 days from the date of judgment and outside the time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

PMK Int. v. Malmgren

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 8, 2009
No. 09-09-00409-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)
Case details for

PMK Int. v. Malmgren

Case Details

Full title:PMK INTERESTS, L.P., Appellant v. LANCE MALMGREN and MONIQUE MALMGREN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

Citations

No. 09-09-00409-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)