Opinion
May, 1913.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. (Ingraham, P.J., dissented.)
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on Pollock v. Shubert Theatrical Company ( 146 App. Div. 628).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Plympton v. Liebler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1913
156 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Summaries of
Plympton v. Liebler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1913
156 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for
Plympton v. Liebler
Case Details
Full title:Eben Plympton, Appellant, v. Theodore A. Liebler and Another, Respondents
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: May 1, 1913
Citations
156 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Citing Cases
Dixey v. Woods Productions Co.
We think it did not say so, but by implication said the contrary." We do not deem the decisions in Pollock v.…