From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plunkett v. Parham

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 24, 2021
2:19-cv-1450 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1450 AC P

11-24-2021

CHARLES PLUNKETT, Plaintiff, v. C. PARHAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983, has filed a motion requesting that defendants be ordered to file a response to the complaint and that a discovery and scheduling order issue. ECF No. 26. By order filed November 15, 2021, defendants were ordered to file a response to the complaint within twenty-one days, ECF No. 25, and their deadline for doing so has not yet passed. A discovery and scheduling order will not issue until defendants have filed an answer to the complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for an order directing defendants to respond to the compliant and for a discovery and scheduling order, ECF No. 26, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Plunkett v. Parham

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 24, 2021
2:19-cv-1450 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Plunkett v. Parham

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PLUNKETT, Plaintiff, v. C. PARHAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1450 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)