From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plunkett v. Castro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03174-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03174-RPM

08-08-2012

JAMES PLUNKETT, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER S. CASTRO, OFFICER ELLERMAN, SERGEANT LOMBARDI, SERGEANT TOWN, and DETECTIVE DANNY PEREZ, all law enforcement officers with the Denver Police Department, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PARTY AND CLAIMS

Pursuant to the Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss [34] filed August 6, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the following claims and parties are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees:

1. Defendant Ellerman
2. Fourth Claim for Relief - First Amendment Retaliation
3. Ninth and Tenth Claim for Relief - Common Law Assault and Battery
4. Eleventh Claim for Relief - Outrageous Conduct

BY THE COURT:

________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Plunkett v. Castro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03174-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Plunkett v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PLUNKETT, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER S. CASTRO, OFFICER ELLERMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03174-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 8, 2012)