From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plunket v. Lane

Supreme Court of Indiana
May 20, 1965
207 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. 1965)

Opinion

No. 0-750.

Filed May 20, 1965.

SUPREME COURT — Jurisdiction — Habeas Corpus. — Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain petition for habeas corpus.

Original action by petitioner, Everett Plunket, for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Petition dismissed.

Everett Plunkett, pro se. John J. Dillon, Attorney General, for respondent.


Petitioner has filed pro se in this court a pleading entitled "Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus." Petitioner pleaded guilty to a charge of second degree burglary, for which he was convicted. The pleading constitutes an attempt to attack the validity of petitioner's commitment by raising questions concerning the conduct of a presentence investigation of his case.

This court on many occasions has noted that we have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition here presented since no original jurisdiction to grant writs of habeas corpus has been placed in the Supreme Court. Lucianno v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 186, 204 N.E.2d 220; State ex rel. Morvilius v. State (1960), 241 Ind. 199, 170 N.E.2d 825; Rash v. Howard (1948), 226 Ind. 546, 82 N.E.2d 88.

For the above reasons the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed.

Arterburn, C.J., Jackson, Landis Myers, JJ., concur.

NOTE. — Reported in 207 N.E.2d 215.


Summaries of

Plunket v. Lane

Supreme Court of Indiana
May 20, 1965
207 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. 1965)
Case details for

Plunket v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:PLUNKET v. LANE, WARDEN INDIANA STATE PRISON

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: May 20, 1965

Citations

207 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. 1965)
207 N.E.2d 215