Opinion
NO. 5:08cv00203 SWW-JWC.
June 30, 2010
ORDER
Respondent has filed a partial motion to quash subpoenas of non-parties Chris Carter and Wes Bradford (doc 79), whose depositions are scheduled for July 1, 2010. In response (doc. 78), Petitioner says he has no opposition to the motion, was not contacted regarding the issue, and is withdrawing the requests to produce the criminal files mentioned in the subpoenas duces tecum. Respondent's motion is denied as moot.
Compliance with Local Rule 7.2(g) regarding this issue would have saved the Court and the parties significant time.
The rule provides:
All motions to compel discovery and all other discovery-enforcement motions and all motions for protective orders shall contain a statement by the moving party that the parties have conferred in good faith on the specific issue or issues in dispute and that they are not able to resolve their disagreements without the intervention of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.