From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plummer v. Caden

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 9, 2004
No. C 04-2715 TEH (pr) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2004)

Opinion

No. C 04-2715 TEH (pr).

August 9, 2004


JUDGMENT


The action is dismissed as legally frivolous.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

William Plummer, a California prisoner incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Plummer alleges in his petition that the United States District Court for the Central District of California erred in its ruling on his earlier habeas petition concerning his conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. This court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of another federal district court. The action therefore must be dismissed as legally frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). This court will not entertain a habeas petition challenging the conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court (any such action belongs in the United States District Court for the Central District of California) or challenging a decision by another federal court. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plummer v. Caden

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 9, 2004
No. C 04-2715 TEH (pr) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2004)
Case details for

Plummer v. Caden

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER, Petitioner, v. Warden CADEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2004

Citations

No. C 04-2715 TEH (pr) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2004)