From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plummer v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
3:11-CV-00865-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-00865-RCJ-WGC

02-25-2013

COLVIN J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #19) entered on September 18, 2012, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court enter an order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF #12) and Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #19).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF #12) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF #11) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25TH day of February, 2013.

______________________

ROBERT C. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Plummer v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
3:11-CV-00865-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Plummer v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:COLVIN J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-00865-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)