From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plummer v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2012
3:11-cv-00865-ECR-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00865-ECR-WGC

03-14-2012

COLVIN J. PLUMMER, #88570, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who is in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, has submitted a civil rights complaint (#4) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which previously has been screened (#3). On the showing made in the pauper application (#1), the Court finds that plaintiff is unable to pay a substantial initial partial filing fee toward the full filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), and the application therefore will be granted as set forth herein.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's application (#1) to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not be required to pay an initial partial filing fee. However, even if this action is dismissed, the full filing fee still must be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

2. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor. This order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the issuance of subpoenas at government expense.

3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), the Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to plaintiff's account, in the months that the account exceeds $10.00, until the full $350.00 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court shall SEND a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office. The Clerk shall also SEND a copy of this order to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.

4. The Attorney General's Office shall advise the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this order whether it can accept service of process for the named defendants. As to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney General's Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s).

5. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full name and address for said defendant(s).

6. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.

7. Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein. The Court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper service.

_______________

EDWARD C. REED

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Plummer v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2012
3:11-cv-00865-ECR-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Plummer v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:COLVIN J. PLUMMER, #88570, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00865-ECR-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Roddrick

Allowing Plaintiff to proceed with claims without having exhausted prior to filing his complaint would create…

Tran v. Wrye

"Allowing Plaintiff to proceed with claims without having exhausted prior to filing his complaint would…