Opinion
No. 3D18-2207
05-22-2019
Richard Plumer II, Appellant, v. U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., Appellee.
Richard Plumer II, in proper person. McGlinchey Stafford, and Charles E. Stoecker, and William L. Grimsley (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal No. 13-20103 An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Richard Plumer II, in proper person. McGlinchey Stafford, and Charles E. Stoecker, and William L. Grimsley (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and MILLER JJ. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Plumer, II v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 250 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); see also Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (The "doctrine [of law of the case states] that those points of law adjudicated in a prior appeal are binding in order to promote stability of judicial decisions and to avoid piecemeal litigation." (citation omitted)); Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So. 2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) ("A per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court's opinion or not." (citation omitted)).