From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plumadore v. Krausmann's, Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

November, 1928.

Present — Hubbs, P.J., Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the charge of the court to the effect that there was an arrest of the plaintiff in the Ross store was erroneous, because a question of fact was involved which should have been submitted to the jury. All concur, Taylor, J., on the further ground that it was for the jury to say whether or not the arrest was illegal, except Sawyer, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance.


Summaries of

Plumadore v. Krausmann's, Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Plumadore v. Krausmann's, Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:IRENE M. PLUMADORE, Respondent, v. KRAUSMANN'S, INCORPORATED, and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)