From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plugmay Ltd. v. National Dynamics

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 5, 1967
53 Misc. 2d 451 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)

Opinion

January 5, 1967

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, MILTON SHALLECK, J.

R. Gettinger M. Gettinger ( Martin A. Gettinger and Irving J. Kaufman of counsel), for appellant.

Theodore P. Halperin for respondent.


On the papers presented below issues of fact as well as of law were presented which precluded recognition of the foreign judgment in the exercise of comity, and the granting of summary judgment. There must be a full disclosure of the jurisdiction of the foreign court and of the acts of the parties to the foreign litigation. "This can best be done at a trial where the court has all the facts before it and can determine under established rules the question of recognition or non-recognition of the judgment of the foreign court." ( Martens v. Martens, 284 N.Y. 363, 366.)

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., TILZER and GOLD, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Plugmay Ltd. v. National Dynamics

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 5, 1967
53 Misc. 2d 451 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
Case details for

Plugmay Ltd. v. National Dynamics

Case Details

Full title:PLUGMAY LIMITED, Respondent, v. NATIONAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1967

Citations

53 Misc. 2d 451 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
278 N.Y.S.2d 896

Citing Cases

Nippon Emo-Trans Ltd. v. Emo-Trans

138 N.Y. at 74, 33 N.E. at 730. At the least, New York courts will readily reexamine jurisdictional issues in…

H. L. Wilkinson Co. Ltd. v. Calvine Mills

The issue of whether the contract sued upon in England was made in London, so as to confer jurisdiction upon…