From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plotch v. Kapco Indus., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2013
110 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-1

Adam PLOTCH, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. KAPCO INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Richard A. Klass, Brooklyn, for appellant. Sweeney Gallo Reich & Bolz, LLP, Rego Park (Rashel M. Mehlman of counsel), for respondents.



Richard A. Klass, Brooklyn, for appellant. Sweeney Gallo Reich & Bolz, LLP, Rego Park (Rashel M. Mehlman of counsel), for respondents.
ANDRIAS, J.P., SWEENY, ACOSTA, SAXE, CLARK, JJ.

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered on or about August 23, 2012 and September 17, 2012, which, in this action to quiet title to a condominium unit, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, the winning bidder in a foreclosure action commenced by the condominium board to recover unpaid common charges, purchased the condominium unit subject to defendants' prior mortgage, which was reduced to a judgment lien. The foreclosure proceeding's notice of sale, judgment of foreclosure and referee's deed expressly provided that the property at issue was being sold subject to the winning bidder's payment of defendants' mortgage lien; therefore, plaintiff is bound by those provisions ( see Grand Pac. Fin. Corp. v. Ashkenazi, 108 A.D.3d 425, 969 N.Y.S.2d 42 [1st Dept.2013]; Cashin v. Simek, 59 A.D.3d 657, 658, 875 N.Y.S.2d 492 [2d Dept.2009] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Plotch v. Kapco Indus., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2013
110 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Plotch v. Kapco Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Adam PLOTCH, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. KAPCO INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 1, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
110 A.D.3d 432
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6317

Citing Cases

AMK Capital Corp. v. Plotch

On September 26, 2011, defendant commenced an action seeking to quiet title to the premises, which Supreme…