From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PLL Techs., Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2017
2016-2219 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2219

06-13-2017

PLL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. XILINX, INC., Appellee

MATTHEW CARMINE PHILLIPS, Laurence & Phillips IP Law LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK MEEKER; STEVE WONG, Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP, Cleveland, OH. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Washington, DC; DAVID B. COCHRAN, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-00148.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW CARMINE PHILLIPS, Laurence & Phillips IP Law LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK MEEKER; STEVE WONG, Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP, Cleveland, OH. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Washington, DC; DAVID B. COCHRAN, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

PLL Techs., Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2017
2016-2219 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2017)
Case details for

PLL Techs., Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PLL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. XILINX, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 2017

Citations

2016-2219 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2017)