From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plizga v. GMAC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
2:09-cv-000651-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

2:09-cv-000651-GEB-DAD.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


On April 17, 2009, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Docket No. 11) and a motion to strike (Docket No. 12). However, on May 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 14), which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner and Co. 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating an amended complaint supersedes the prior complaint). Since the pending motions do not address the operative pleading, they are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Plizga v. GMAC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
2:09-cv-000651-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Plizga v. GMAC

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR PLIZGA, Plaintiffs, v. GMAC, GMAC MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE, ELECTRONIC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

2:09-cv-000651-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)