From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plitt v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2008
1:07-cv-01879 WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-01879 WMW (HC).

October 2, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCUMENT #21) (30) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 26, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plitt v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2008
1:07-cv-01879 WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Plitt v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:BRYANT W. PLITT, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-01879 WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)