Opinion
Case No. 17-cv-04405-HSG
03-13-2020
PLEXXIKON INC., Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 149, 164, 166, 168, 176, 178, 185, 187, 193, 196, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 224, 226, 231, 232, 235, 242, 258, 261, 263, 265, 267, 282, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 306, 314, 332, 363, 366, 368, 374
Pending before the Court are the parties' administrative motions to file under seal portions of documents in connection with motions for partial summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine filed by Plaintiff Plexxikon Inc. and Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (twenty-eight total). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motions to file under seal.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Courts generally apply a "compelling reasons" standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). "This standard derives from the common law right 'to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.'" Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). "[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point." Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations omitted). To overcome this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal a judicial record attached to a dispositive motion must "articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process" and "significant public events." Id. at 1178-79 (quotations omitted). "In general, 'compelling reasons' sufficient to outweigh the public's interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such 'court files might have become a vehicle for improper purposes,' such as the use of records to gratify private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets." Id. at 1179 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)). "The mere fact that the production of records may lead to a litigant's embarrassment, incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the court to seal its records." Id.
Civil Local Rule 79-5 supplements the "compelling reasons" standard. The party seeking to file under seal must submit "a request that establishes that the document, or portions thereof, are privileged, protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law . . . . The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material . . . ." Civil L.R. 79-5(b). Courts have found that "confidential business information" in the form of "license agreements, financial terms, details of confidential licensing negotiations, and business strategies" satisfies the "compelling reasons" standard. See In re Qualcomm Litig., No. 3:17-cv-0108-GPC-MDD, 2017 WL 5176922, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017) (observing that sealing such information "prevent[ed] competitors from gaining insight into the parties' business model and strategy"); Finisar Corp. v. Nistica, Inc., No. 13-cv-03345-BLF (JSC), 2015 WL 3988132, at *5 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2015).
Records attached to nondispositive motions must meet the lower "good cause" standard of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as such records "are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action." Id. at 1179-80 (quotations omitted). This requires a "particularized showing" that "specific prejudice or harm will result" if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). "Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated reasoning" will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992) (quotation omitted). //
II. DISCUSSION
Because the parties seek to seal portions and documents which pertain to summary judgment motions, the Court applies the compelling reasons standard to these documents. The Court applies the lower good cause standard for those documents related to the parties' Daubert motions and motions in limine.
As indicated in the table below, the only proffered justification for sealing many of the documents is that the information was designated as "highly confidential" by either Plaintiff, Defendant, or non-parties GlaskoSmithKline PLC and GlaskoSmithKline LLC. But a designation of confidentiality is not sufficient to establish that a document is sealable. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A). "Confidential" is merely the parties' initial designation of confidentiality to establish coverage under the stipulated protective order. See Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 12-cv-05501-SI, 2015 WL 5117083, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2015) ("But good cause 'cannot be established simply by showing that the document is subject to a protective order or by stating in general terms that the material is considered to be confidential'") (quoting Bain v. AstraZeneca LP, No. 09-cv-4147, 2011 WL 482767, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)). Thus, many of the parties' motions do not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A). In addition, in many instances the designating party for the materials did not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), because they did not file a declaration within four days of the motion. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). The Court finds that sealing is not warranted as to those documents.
Nevertheless, the Court finds that as to the remaining motions to seal, the parties have narrowly tailored their requested redactions to confidential and proprietary business, scientific, manufacturing, sales, or licensing information. The public release of these documents could give non-party competitors an unfair advantage in the development or marketing of rival products. See In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App'x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (ordering sealing where documents could be used "'as sources of business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing'") (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)). Thus, the Court finds that the parties have in those circumstances established either compelling reasons or good cause to grant the motions to file under seal. See, e.g., Linex Techs., Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., No. C 13-159 CW, 2014 WL 6901744 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2014); Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 11-CV-01846-LHK, 2012 WL 6115623 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2012).
| Docket No.Public /(Sealed) | Document | Portion(s) Sought to beSealed | Ruling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 149 - GRANTED | |||
| Dkt. No. 150-1/(149-4) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of Daralyn J.Durie in Support of March18, 2019 Discovery Letter | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 153.) |
| Dkt. No. 164 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 165/(164-4) | Plaintiff's Notice ofMotion and Motion toExclude Certain Opinionsand Testimony ofNovartis's TechnicalExperts | Page 2:15-28Page 3:1-13, 18-20Page 4:4-15, 19-20Page 5:5-12, 18-20, 24-26Page 6:13-15Page 8:19-24Page 9:1-5Page 10:1-6, 15-22, 27-28Page 11:25-28Page 12:1-2, 9-11 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 165-2/(164-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of Novartis'sTechnical Experts | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 165-3/(164-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of Novartis'sTechnical Experts | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 165-5/(164-10) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of Novartis's | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Technical Experts | |||
| Dkt. No. 165-6/(164-12) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of Novartis'sTechnical Experts | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 165-8/(164-14) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of Novartis'sTechnical Experts | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 166 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 167/(166-4) | Plaintiff's Notice ofMotion and Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | Page 1:8-9, 13-18Page 2:9Page 5:17-22, 26-28Page 6:1-10Page 11:13-22Page 12:3, 6-18, 20Page 13:17-18, 20-24Page 14:1-2Page 15:13-14, 21-24Page 16:1-7, 10, 12Page 17:13-14 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 167-2/(166-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of MatthewW. Samuels in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 167-10/(166-8) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of MatthewW. Samuels in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 167-20/(166-10) | Exhibit 19 to theDeclaration of MatthewW. Samuels in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 167-21/(166-12) | Exhibit 20 to theDeclaration of MatthewW. Samuels in Support of | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceutical |
| Plaintiff's Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | research anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 171.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 167-22/(166-14) | Exhibit 21 to theDeclaration of MatthewW. Samuels in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion forSummary Judgment of NoAnticipation | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 171.) |
| Dkt. No. 168 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 169/(168-10) | Plaintiff's Notice ofMotion and Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of James E.Malackowski | Page i:7-10Page 1:6-9, 12-15, 20Page 2:7-10, 16-28Page 3:1-28Page 4:1-6Page 7:3-28Page 8:1-2, 4-15, 19-20,26-27Page 9:8-17Page 10:1-7, 16-28Page 11:1, 11-12, 14-24Page 12:4-5, 16-28Page 13:1-14, 17-28Page 14:1-17, 19-20 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 169-1/(168-4) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of James E.Malackowski | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 169-3/(168-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of James E.Malackowski | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 169-4/(168-8) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of James E.Malackowski | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 176 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 177/(176-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page 2:16, 24-28Page 3:6-14, 21-26Page 4:1-2, 7-11Page 5:11-26Page 6:1-13Page 7:2-18, 20Page 8:8-12, 26-27Page 9:1-2, 6-15Page 12:28Page 13:1, 5-8, 10-18Page 14:5-9Page 15:25-27Page 16:21-22Page 17:15-18 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 3:6-14,21-26• Page 4:1-2, 7-11• Page 5:11-26• Page 6:1-13• Page 12:28• Page 13:1, 5-8,10-18• Page 14:5-9See Dkt. No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-16/(176-12) | Declaration of Tara R.Rheault, PhD., In Supportof Defendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page 2:3, 7, 10, 23, 25-26Page 3:1-27Page 4:1, 3-12 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-17/(176-13) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration ofTara R. Rheault, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-18/(176-14) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration ofTara R. Rheault, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-2/(176-6) | Declaration of Phil S.Baran, PhD., In Supportof Defendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page 2:11-16, 18-27Page 3:1, 11-18Page 4:9-13Page 5:5-23, 25-26Appendix A, pp. 1-3, 9-11, 19Appendix B in its entirety | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-6/(Native ExcelFile) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration ofPhil S. Baran, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 177-7/(176-7) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration ofPhil S. Baran, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-8/(176-8) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration ofPhil S. Baran, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-9/(176-9) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration ofPhil S. Baran, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 182.) |
| Dkt. No. 177-14/(176-10) | Exhibit 12 to theDeclaration ofPhil S. Baran, PhD., InSupport of Defendant'sMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 177-20/(176-15) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration OfThomas P. Steindler InSupport Of Defendant'sMotion For PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 177-22/(176-16) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration OfThomas P. Steindler InSupport Of Defendant'sMotion For PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 178 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 179/(178-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toStrike Portionsof Expert Report ofPlaintiff's Expert MichaelL. Metzker, Ph.D. | Page i:12Page 2:2-3, 5-6, 8, 9, 12-15, 18-19, 21Page 5:10-12, 16-23Page 6:8Page 7:5, 7, 10, 15, 18-19,20, 24Page 8:3, 7, 11, 16, 20,27-28Page 9:1-2, 16 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 179-3/(178-5) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of DavidMlaver In Support OfDefendant's Motion ToStrike Portions of ExpertReport of Plaintiff'sExpert Michael L.Metzker, Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 179-7/(178-7) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of DavidMlaver In Support OfDefendant's Motion ToStrike Portions of ExpertReport of Plaintiff'sExpert Michael L.Metzker, Ph.D. | Pages 12-15 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 179-9/(178-8) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of DavidMlaver In Support OfDefendant's Motion ToStrike Portions of ExpertReport of Plaintiff'sExpert Michael L.Metzker, Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 185 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 186/(185-4) | Defendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Page 4:8, 13Page 5:13Page 7:25Page 10:7Page 14:1-2, 5, 24-25Page 15:6-21 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch and |
| Page 16:12-13, 23-25Page 17:15-16, 20-21Page 18:15-18, 24-26Page 19:8-9 | developmentinformation:• Page 15:10-17See Dkt. No. 190.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 186-3/(185-5) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 186-4/(185-7) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | ¶¶ 80-84, 86-87, 99-108 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• ¶¶ 86, 104, 107,108See Dkt. No. 190.) |
| Dkt. No. 186-6/(185-8) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummaryJudgment Of NoAnticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 186-8/(185-9) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Entire document | DENIED(Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that the documents"contain and refer tocompetitivelysensitive documentsthe public disclosureof which would causeharm to Novartis."See Dkt. No. 185-1.This genericexplanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) |
| Dkt. No. 186-9/(185-10) | Exhibit 8 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support Of | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceutical |
| Defendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | research anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 190.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 186-10/(185-11) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 190.) |
| Dkt. No. 186-11/(185-12) | Exhibit 10 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 186-12/(185-13) | Exhibit 11 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ForSummary Judgment OfNo Anticipation | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 187 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 188/(187-4) | Defendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ToExclude The OpinionsAnd Testimony Of JamesE. Malackowski | Page i:8-10Page 1:7-8, 10, 15-16, 21Page 2:19-27Page 3:1-15, 18-19, 23,25-26Page 5:3-5, 8, 13, 16, 19-20, 23, 25-26Page 6:5Page 7:12-14, 16-19, 23Page 8:7, 13-17, 19, 20,22, 24-28Page 9:3, 6-7Page 10:5-7, 16-20, 25-28Page 11:1-2, 27-28 | DENIED(Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that the documents"contain and refer tocompetitivelysensitive documentsthe public disclosureof which would causeharm to Novartis."See Dkt. No. 187-1.This genericexplanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) |
| Dkt. No. 188-2/(187-5) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ToExclude The OpinionsAnd Testimony Of James | Entire document | GRANTED INPART(Pages 12, 52-63contain trade secretsand highlyconfidential licensinginformation. See Dkt. |
| E. Malackowski | No. 191. As to therest of the document,Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that it "contain[s] andrefer[s] tocompetitivelysensitive"information. See Dkt.No. 187-1. Thisgeneric explanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 188-3/(187-6) | Exhibit B to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ToExclude The OpinionsAnd Testimony Of JamesE. Malackowski | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 188-4/(187-7) | Exhibit C to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's OppositionTo Plaintiff's Motion ToExclude The OpinionsAnd Testimony Of JamesE. Malackowski | Entire document | DENIED(Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that the documents"contain and refer tocompetitivelysensitive documentsthe public disclosureof which would causeharm to Novartis."See Dkt. No. 187-1.This genericexplanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) |
| Dkt. No. 193 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 194/(193-4) | Plaintiff's Reply inSupport of Its Motion toExclude the Opinions andTestimony of James E.Malackowski | Page i:5-9Page 1:5, 8-14, 17, 23-24Page 2:9-11Page 3:2, 27Page 4:8-12, 21-25, 27-28Page 5:1-2, 12-13, 15-16,25-28Page 6:1-2, 4-9, 14-17,23-26Page 8:3-13 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Page 9:9-10 | |||
| Dkt. No. 196 - DENIED | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 197/(196-4) | Plaintiff's Reply inSupport of Its Motion toExclude Certain Opinionsand Testimony ofNovartis's TechnicalExperts | Page 3:3-14Page 5:6-8, 24-28Page 6:1-18Page 7:2-6 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 199 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No 200/(199-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Page 2:14, 22-28Page 3:1-12, 14-26Page 4:1-10Page 5:23Page 6:7-8, 11-13, 17-21, 24-25, 27-28Page 7:5-6, 8-11, 14-28Page 8:1-6, 16-17, 20-26Page 9:3-6, 9, 10-13, 16-19, 21, 22-24, 26-27Page 10:1-11, 20-24Page 11:6-8Page 12:20, 24 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 200-1/(199-6) | Declaration of Phil S.Baran, Ph.D. In SupportOf Defendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | ¶¶ 17-28, 30-35, 37-45,47, 49, 58, 59 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 200-5/(199-7) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 200-6/(199-8) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 200-7/(199-9) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker, | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Ph.D. | |||
| Dkt. No. 200-8/(199-10) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 200-9/(199-11) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 200-10/(199-12) | Exhibit 8 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Michael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 201 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 202/(201-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 1:22-28Page 2:1-16, 18-28Page 3:1-13Page 5:5-12, 15-24Page 6, lines 15-28Page 7, lines 1-3, 6-11 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 202-2/(201-5) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 202-3/(201-6) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 203 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 204/(203-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. Susana | Page 1:20-25Page 2:1,4-25Page 3:1-5Page 7:21-23, 25-28 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Ortiz-Urda Under Daubert | Page 8:1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 204-2/(203-5) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 204-3/(203-6) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 205 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 206/(205-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Page 2:6-7, 21Page 6:2-5, 18-20 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 206-2/(205-5) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 207 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 208/(207-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Reportof Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Page 1:3-4, 6Page 3:2-3, 22, 24Page 4:4-5, 28Page 5:2-4Page 9:13-14, 16 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 221.) |
| Dkt. No. 208-1/(207-6) | Declaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Reportof Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Page 2:3-4 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 221.) |
| Dkt. No. 208-5/(207-8) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Report | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt. |
| of Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | No. 221.) | ||
| Dkt. No. 208-10/(207-10) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Reportof Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Page 11:10-11, 14-16,18-21Page 14:27-28Page 15:3-9 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 221.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 208-14/(207-12) | Exhibit 13 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Reportof Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 221.) |
| Dkt. No. 208-15/(207-14) | Exhibit 14 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toStrike Portions of Reportof Plaintiff's ExpertMichael L. Metzker,Ph.D. | Page 10:13-16, 26Page 31:11-17 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 209 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 210/(209-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Page i:8-9Page 2:7-9Page 5:17-28Page 6:1, 3-10, 18-22,24-28Page 7:1-2, 4Page 8:6-13, 18-20Page 9:3-4, 6-7, 9-10Page 14:15-17Page 15:4-5, 7-9, 11, 13-14Page 17:4-11, 26-27Page 21:23-25Page 22:1-2 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 6:5-10, 12-22, 24-28• Page 7:1-2, 4See Dkt. No. 223.) |
| Dkt. No. 210-6/(209-6) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support of | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceutical |
| Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | research anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 223.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 210-7/(209-8) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 223.) |
| Dkt. No. 210-8/(209-10) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 223.) |
| Dkt. No. 210-9/(209-12) | Exhibit 8 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 223.) |
| Dkt. No. 210-10/(209-14) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 210-11/(209-16) | Exhibit 10 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 210-12/(209-18) | Exhibit 11 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support of | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. See |
| Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) | ||
| Dkt. No. 210-13/(209-20) | Exhibit 12 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 210-14/(209-22) | Exhibit 13 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis PharmaceuticalsCorporation's Motion forJudgment on thePleadings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 211 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 212/(211-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page i:11-13Page 1:3-5, 17, 19-21, 23,28Page 8:2, 4, 28Page 9:1-4, 7, 24-28Page 10:1, 7-13, 22-24,26-28Page 11:4, 7-9Page 15:19Page 16:12-13Page 17:10-12 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page i:11-13• Page 1:3-5, 17,23, 28• Page 8:2, 4, 28• Page 9:1-4, 24-28• Page 10:1, 7-13,22-24, 26-28• Page 11:4, 7-9• Page 15:19• Page 16:12-13See Dkt. No. 222.) |
| Dkt. No. 213-1/(211-6) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of Michael L.Metzker in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial Summary | Page 42:1-25Page 43:1-6 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Judgment | |||
| Dkt. No. 213-2/(211-8) | Exhibit B to theDeclaration of Michael L.Metzker in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page 10:15-16, 26Page 15:10-22, 14-16,18-20, 26-27Page 16:1, 18-20, 23-24Page 27:17Page 31:11-19Page 46:20-21Page 62:1, 3, 6-12, 14-15,26Page 63:1-4, 7-8, 26Page 64:9-11Page 65:2, 7-9, 11-12, 14,18, 20-22Page 66:23-26Page 67:1-2, 4, 6-24Page 106:1-3, 5, 11-12,15-18 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 62:1, 3, 6-12, 14-15, 26• Page 63:1-4• Page 65:18• Page 66:23-26• Page 67:1-2, 4,6-24• Page 106:1-3.See Dkt. No. 222.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 212-13/(211-10) | Exhibit 12 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 212-20/(211-12) | Exhibit 19 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 214-1/(211-14) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of JeffreyWinkler in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 224 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 325/(224-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 1:17-18Page 4:6-7Page 5:1 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 325-2/(224-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support of | Page 31, ¶¶ 62-63Page 32, ¶¶ 63-65Page 33, ¶¶ 65-66, n.88 | GRANTED INPART(The following |
| Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 34, ¶ 68Page 35, ¶ 69, n.93, 95Page 36, ¶ 70Page 37, ¶ 72Page 38, ¶¶ 72-73, n.102,104Page 39, ¶¶ 73-74, n.107Page 40, n.110Page 44, ¶ 81Page 72, ¶¶ 124-125Page 73, ¶ 125Page 74, ¶ 128, n.219Page 75, ¶¶ 128-129Page 76, ¶¶ 131-132,n.222Page 77, ¶¶ 132-135Page 81, ¶ 147 | contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 44, ¶ 81• Page 71-72,¶ 124• Page 76, n.222• Page 77, ¶¶ 133,135See Dkt. No. 237.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 325-3/(224-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 45, n.133Page 46, ¶ 74 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 226 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 227/(226-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | Page 3:7-13, 16-21Page 5:14-15, 21-24Page 6:22-27Page 9:8-10 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 227-2/(226-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | Page 9, ¶ 20Page 22, ¶ 50Page 25, n.52Page 26, ¶ 59, n.54Page 27, ¶¶ 60, 61Page 28, ¶ 63, n.61Page 29, ¶ 66 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 227-3/(226-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 231 - DENIED | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 233/(231-4) | Defendant's Reply inSupport of Motion forPartial SummaryJudgment | Page 1:15-17Page 2:6-7Page 3:4-5Page 6:5-8, 12-13, 21,23-24 27-28Page 7:1-4, 8 13, 16, 26-28Page 11:20-28Page 12:8Page 13:20-23Page 15:8-10, 13-14, 17 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 233-2/(231-6) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of ThomasSteindler in Support ofReply in Support ofMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Pages 12-15 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 233-3/(231-7) | Exhibit B to theDeclaration of ThomasSteindler in Support ofReply in Support ofMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 233-4/(231-8) | Exhibit C to theDeclaration of ThomasSteindler in Support ofReply in Support ofMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 233-5/(231-9) | Exhibit D to theDeclaration of ThomasSteindler in Support ofReply in Support ofMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 233-6/(231-10) | Exhibit E to theDeclaration of ThomasSteindler in Support ofReply in Support ofMotion for PartialSummary Judgment | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 232 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 234/(232-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Page 3:25-28Page 4:1-2, 5-20Page 6:7Page 7:24-25Page 8:11-14, 23, 28 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Page 9:15, 28Page 11:21, 27-28Page 12:17, 28Page 13:5-7, 12-13, 26 | |||
| Dkt. No. 234-3/(232-6) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Page 13:12-13, 15-26Page 14:5, 7-17Page 23:22-23Page 24:7-12Page 25:16-27Page 26:1-10, 12-14 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 234-5/(232-8) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 234-6/(232-10) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Ted Sweeney | Page 1:19-21, 23-26, 28Page 2:1-3, 6-7, 12-16,27-28Page 3:1-3, 11-12Page 4:3, 5Page 5:17-18Page 6:15-16Page 7:19-27Page 8:1-2, 10-15 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 235 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 236/(235-4) | Plaintiff's Motion toStrike Defendant'sDaubert Motions FiledJune 6, 2019 | Page 4:27-28Page 5:1 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 236-2/(235-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toStrike Defendant'sDaubert Motions FiledJune 6, 2019 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 236-3/(235-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion toStrike Defendant'sDaubert Motions FiledJune 6, 2019 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 242 - GRANTED | |||
| Dkt. No. 242-3/ | Exhibit 5 to the | Entire document | GRANTED |
| (Native ExcelFile) | Declaration of TomSteindler in Support ofDefendant's Reply inSupport of Motion toPreclude CertainTestimony of Dr. SusanaOrtiz-Urda Under Daubert | (Contains licensingand proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 242.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 258 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 259/(258-4) | Plaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 1 ExcludingUndisclosed ValidityChallenges | Page 1:24-28Page 2:1-3, 15-18Page 3:1-3 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 259-2/(258-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion inLimine No. 1 ExcludingUndisclosed ValidityChallenges | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 259-3/(258-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Motion inLimine No. 1 ExcludingUndisclosed ValidityChallenges | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 261 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 262/(261-4) | Plaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Page 1:8-9Page 2:2-22Page 3:2-3 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 262-2/(261-6) | Exhibit 1 of theDeclaration Of Laura E.Miller In Support OfPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 262-3/(261-8) | Exhibit 2 of theDeclaration Of Laura E.Miller In Support OfPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 262-4/(261-10) | Exhibit 3 of theDeclaration Of Laura E.Miller In Support Of | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. See |
| Plaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) | ||
| Dkt. No. 262-5/(261-12) | Exhibit 4 of theDeclaration Of Laura E.Miller In Support OfPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 262-6/(261-14) | Exhibit 5 of theDeclaration Of Laura E.Miller In Support OfPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 3 Re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 263 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 264/(263-4) | Plaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 4 re:Excluding WithheldEvidence | Page 2:25-28Page 3:1-3Page 3:7-9Page 4:28Page 5:1 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 264-1/(263-6) | Declaration of Laura E.Miller In Support ofPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 4 re:Excluding WithheldEvidence | Page 1:17-19 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 264-6/(263-8) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller In Support ofPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 4 re:Excluding WithheldEvidence | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 264-7/(263-10) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller In Support ofPlaintiff's Motion InLimine No. 4 re:Excluding WithheldEvidence | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 265 - GRANTED | |||
| Dkt. No. 266/(265-4) | Plaintiff's Motion inLimine No. 5 re:Excluding Hidden | Page 1:20-25Page 2:2-3, 7-9 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceutical |
| Hearsay Testimony | research anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 274.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 266-2/(265-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in support ofPlaintiff's Motion inLimine No. 5 re:Excluding HiddenHearsay Testimony | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 274.) |
| Dkt. No. 267 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 273-5/(267-5) | Exhibit E to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofNovartis's Motions inLimine | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 267-1.) |
| Dkt. No. 273-6/(267-7) | Exhibit F to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler InSupport of Novartis'sMotions in Limine | Page i:11-13Page 1:3-5, 17, 19-21, 23,28Page 8:2, 4, 28Page 9:1-4, 7, 24-28Page 10:1, 7-13, 22-24,26-28Page 11:4, 7-9Page 15:19Page 16:12-13Page 17:10-12 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page i:11-13• Page 1:3-5, 17,23, 28• Page 8:2, 4, 28• Page 9:1-4, 24-28• Page 10:1, 7-13,22-24, 26-28• Page 11:4, 7-9• Page 15:19• Page 16:12-13See Dkt. No. 222.) |
| Dkt. No. 273-7/(267-9) | Exhibit G to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler InSupport of Novartis'sMotions in Limine | Page i:8-9Page 2:7-9Page 5:17-28Page 6:1, 3-10, 18-22,24-28Page 7:1-2, 4Page 8:6-13, 18-20Page 9:3-4, 6-7, 9-10Page 14:15-17 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 6:5-10, 12- |
| Page 15:4-5, 7-9, 11, 13-14Page 17:4-11, 26-27Page 21:23-25Page 22:1-2 | 22, 24-28• Page 7:1-2, 4See Dkt. No. 223.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 273-11/(267-10) | Exhibit K to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofNovartis's Motions inLimine | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 272/(267-4) | Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 re: Evidenceor Argument SuggestingDamages Should BeAwarded for Any PeriodAfter December 2018 | Page 1:12-26Page 2:25-26 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 282 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 283/(282-4) | Opposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 1 re:Excluding UndisclosedValidity Challenges | Page 2:12-13, 19-20, 23-24Page 3:5-8 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 285 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 286-2/(285-4) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofOpposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 3 re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | ¶¶ 3, 7, 17, 21, 25, 26, 28-31, 75-78, 115-122, 126,127 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 286-7/(285-6) | Exhibit F to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofOpposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 3 re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | ¶ 3 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 286-9/(285-8) | Exhibit H to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofOpposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 3 re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | ¶¶ 61-65 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 286-10/(285-10) | Exhibit I to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support ofOpposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 3 re:Cumulative ExpertTestimony | ¶¶ 57-59, 77-80 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 287 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 288-3/(287-3) | Exhibit B to theDeclaration ofThomas P. Steindler InSupport Of Novartis'sOpposition to Plexxikon'sMotion in Limine No. 4re: Excluding WithheldEvidence | Entire document | DENIED(Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that the document"contain[s] andrefer[s] tocompetitivelysensitive documentsthe public disclosureof which would causeharm to Novartis."See Dkt. No. 287-1.This genericexplanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) |
| Dkt. No. 288-4/(287-4) | Exhibit C to theDeclaration ofThomas P. Steindler InSupport Of Novartis'sOpposition to Plexxikon'sMotion in Limine No. 4re: Excluding WithheldEvidence | Entire document | DENIED(Defendant states, inconclusory fashion,that the document"contain[s] andrefer[s] tocompetitivelysensitive documentsthe public disclosureof which would causeharm to Novartis."See Dkt. No. 287-1.This genericexplanation isinsufficient toestablish good cause.) |
| Dkt. No. 289 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 290/(289-4) | Opposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 5 re:Excluding HiddenHearsay Testimony | Page 1:21-23;Page 2:20-25;Page 3:1-8;Page 5:3 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt. |
| No. 301.) | |||
| Dkt. No. 290-2/(289-5) | Exhibit A to theDeclaration ofThomas P. Steindler InSupport of Opposition ToPlexxikon's Motion inLimine No. 5 re:Excluding HiddenHearsay Testimony | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 291 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 292/(291-3) | Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 1 Re: PTABProceedings | Page 2:7-10 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 292-6/(291-5) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 1 Re: PTABProceedings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 292-8/(291-7) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 1 Re: PTABProceedings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 292-9/(291-9) | Exhibit 8 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 1 Re: PTABProceedings | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 293 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 294/(293-3) | Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 re:Unasserted Patents asEvidence of the Validityof the Asserted Patents | Page 2:3-5, 11-16 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 294-3/(293-5) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 re: | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Unasserted Patents asEvidence of the Validityof the Asserted Patents | |||
| Dkt. No. 294-5/(293-7) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 re:Unasserted Patents asEvidence of the Validityof the Asserted Patents | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 295 - DENIED | |||
| Dkt. No. 296-2/(295-3) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 re: Evidenceor ArgumentMischaracterizing orHaving a Tendency toMislead as to the Scope ofPlexxikon's Patent Rights | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 296-3/(295-5) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 re: Evidenceor ArgumentMischaracterizing orHaving a Tendency toMislead as to the Scope ofPlexxikon's Patent Rights | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 297 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 326/(297-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | Page 1:19-24Page 2:9, 17-28Page 3:1-5, 8-20 | GRANTED(Contains licensingnegotiation, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 302.) |
| Dkt. No. 326-2/(297-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support of | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceutical |
| Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | research anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 302.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 326-3/(297-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re:Alleged Copying | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 302.) |
| Dkt. No. 316/(297-10) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains licensingnegotiation, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 302.) |
| Dkt. No. 298-5/(297-12) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains licensingnegotiation, as well asproprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 302.) |
| Dkt. No. 298-6/(297-14) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re:Alleged Copying | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 298-7/(297-16) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 298-8/(297-18) | Exhibit 7 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion in | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Limine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | |||
| Dkt. No. 299 - DENIED | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 327-4/(299-4) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 327-5/(299-6) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 306 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 307/(306-4) | Defendant's Notice ofMotion and Motion toStrike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | Page:2:25-28Page 6:25-26Page 8:11Page 9:10, 17-26Page 10:1-14, 24-28Page 11:1-14, 16-18Page 13:4-10Page 14:22-23Page 15:1-9, 17-20Page 16:4, 7-11, 20-22,24-27Page 17:1-8 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 307-2/(306-5) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant's Motion ToStrike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 307-3/(306-7) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Thomas P. | ¶ 59, &n.75Figure 4 | GRANTED(Contains licensing |
| Steindler In Support OfDefendant's Motion ToStrike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | ¶¶ 75-77, & n.112, 115,117¶ 79, & n.118¶¶ 112-114, & n.194Exhibit 3 (pages 1 and 2) | negotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 312.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 307-4/(306-8) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler In Support OfDefendant'sMotion To Strike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 314 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 325/(314-5) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 3:16-22, 23-24, 26 | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets and licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 325/(314-5) | Plaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 1:17-18Page 2:3-13Page 4:6-7Page 5:1 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 325-2/(314-7) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 29, ¶ 59Page 40, ¶ 79Page 41, n.112Page 42, n.117, 118Page 44, ¶ 83Page 45, ¶¶ 83-85Page 46, ¶¶ 85-86, n.132-134Page 47, ¶¶ 86-88, n.135Page 48, ¶¶ 88-89, n.139-140Page 58, ¶¶ 102, 104Page 59, ¶ 104Page 60, ¶¶ 106-107Page 61, ¶¶ 107-109,n.185Page 62, ¶¶ 109-110,n.188Page 65, ¶¶ 113-114,n.194Page 66, ¶ 114Page 81, ¶ 144, n.231 | GRANTED(Contains tradesecrets and licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 325-2/(314-7) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toDefendant's Motion toExclude Expert Testimonyof Gregory K. Leonard,Ph.D. | Page 28, ¶ 57Page 29, ¶ 60Page 30, Figure 4Page 31, ¶¶ 62-63Page 32, ¶¶ 63-65Page 33, ¶¶ 65-66, n.88Page 34, ¶ 68Page 35, ¶¶ 68-69, n.93,95Page 36, ¶ 70Page 37, ¶ 72Page 38, ¶¶ 72-73, n.102,104Page 39, ¶¶ 73-74, n.107Page 40, n.110Page 44, ¶ 81Page 68, ¶¶ 117-118Page 69, ¶¶ 119-120Page 70, ¶¶ 120-121Page 71, ¶¶ 122-123Page 72, ¶¶ 124-125Page 73, ¶¶ 126-127Page 74, ¶¶ 127-128,n.219Page 75, ¶¶ 128-131Page 76, ¶¶ 131-132,n.222Page 77, ¶¶ 132-135 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 44, ¶ 81• Page 68, ¶¶ 117-118• Page 69, ¶¶ 119-120• Page 70, ¶¶ 120-121• Page 71, ¶¶ 122-123• Page 72, ¶¶ 124-125• Page 73, ¶¶ 126-127• Page 74, ¶¶ 127-128, n.219• Page 75, ¶¶ 128-131• Page 76, ¶¶ 131-132, n.222• Page 77, ¶¶ 132-135See Dkt. No. 330.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 316/(314-9) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 Re: AllegedCopying | Page 44, ¶ 83 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 327-2/(314-11) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlexxikon's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Page 2:20-27Page 3:1-28Page 4:1-2, 4-27Page 5:8-9 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 327-3/(314-13) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlexxikon's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Page 14:8-10 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 327-4/(314-15) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Page 65, ¶ 113Page 66, ¶ 114 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 327-4/(314-15) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Page 27, ¶ 56Page 27-28, ¶ 57 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 327-5/(314-17) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | Exhibits 2a, 2b, 3, and 4 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
| Dkt. No. 327-5/(314-17) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition to | Page 1-2, ¶ 4Exhibits 5a, 5b, 5c, and 6 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 5 Re:Evidence or ArgumentSuggesting DamagesShould be Awarded forAny Period AfterDecember 2018 | |||
| Dkt. No. 319/(314-19) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toStrike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | Page 2:20-27Page 3:1-28Page 4:1-2, 4-27Page 5:8-9 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 314.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 319/(314-19) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Thomas P.Steindler in Support ofDefendant's Motion toStrike SecondSupplemental Report ofPlaintiff's Expert GregoryK. Leonard, Ph.D. | Page 6:2-3 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 332 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 333/(332-4) | Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | Page 6:26-27Page 16:20-21 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 333-4/(332-6) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | Page 2:20-27Pages 3-4Page 5:8-9 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 332.) |
| Dkt. No. 333-5/(332-8) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | Page 14:8-10 | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 332.) |
| Dkt. No. 333-6/(332-10) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support of | Pages 23-24, ¶ 51, n.55Page 25, ¶ 53, n.63-64Pages 27-28, ¶¶ 56-57, | GRANTED INPART(The following |
| Plaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | n.72Pages 34-36, ¶¶ 68-70,n.93, 95Pages 37-38, ¶¶ 72-73,n.102, 104 | contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 25, ¶ 53,n.63-64• Pages 27-28,¶ 57, n.72See Dkt. No. 334.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 333-6/(332-10) | Exhibit 5 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | Page 41, ¶ 76, n.112Page 42, n.117-118Page 58, ¶¶ 102, 104Page 61-62, ¶¶ 107-110,n.185Page 65-66, ¶¶ 113-114,n.194Page 85, ¶ 153Exhibit 3 (pages 1 and 2) | GRANTED(Contains trade secretand licensingnegotiation terms.See Dkt. No. 332.) |
| Dkt. No. 333-7/(332-12) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition toNovartis's Motion toStrike the SecondSupplemental Report ofDr. Gregory K. Leonard | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 363 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 364/(363-4) | Plaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | Page 1:14-15, 20-23Page 8:13-17Page 9:1-2 | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 364-2/(363-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 364-3/(363-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 364-5/(363-10) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of Proof | Entire document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarymanufacturinginformation. See Dkt. |
| Re: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | No. 370.) | ||
| Dkt. No. 364-7/(363-12) | Exhibit 6 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 364-10/(363-14) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 2 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 366 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 367/(366-5) | Plaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | Page 16:10 | GRANTED(Contains confidentialsales information.See Dkt. No. 366.) |
| Dkt. No. 367/(366-5) | Plaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | Page 6:3-11Page 11:7-28Page 12:1-18Page 13:1-14Page 14:6-18Page 16:3, 21-22Page 19:18-19, 27Page 21:13-20 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 11:7-28• Page 12:1-18• Page 13:1-14See Dkt. No. 371.) |
| Dkt. No. 367-2/(366-7) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 367-3/(366-9) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 367-4/(366-11) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of Proof | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Re: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | |||
| Dkt. No. 367-5/(366-13) | Exhibit 4 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 3 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 368 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 369/(368-4) | Plaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 | Page 1:9-10Page 2:6-9Page 3:16-20, 22-25Page 4:2-7, 11-12, 27-28Page 5:1, 7-9, 12-16, 17-27Page 6:3-6, 12-14, 16-28Page 7:1, 4-24, 26-28Page 8:1-5, 13-16Page 9:4, 11-16, 18-28Page 10:1, 9-13Page 11:1-4, 6-16Page 12:15-24Page 13:1, 4-6, 8-14, 17-20, 23-24, 28Page 14:1-5 | GRANTED INPART(The followingcontains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation:• Page 1:9-10• Page 2:6-9• Page 3:16-20,22-25• Page 4:2-7, 11-12, 27-28• Page 5:1, 7-9,12-27• Page 6:4-7, 13-15, 17-28• Page 7:1-2, 5-25, 27-28• Page 8:1-6, 15-17;• Page 9:20-25,27-28• Page 10:1-10,18-22• Page 12:26-28• Page 13:1-8, 11-13• Page 14:2-3, 11-15• Page 15:6, 14, 19See Dkt. No. 372.) |
| Dkt. No. 369-2/(368-6) | Exhibit 1 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of Proof | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Re: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 | |||
| Dkt. No. 369-3/(368-8) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of Laura E.Miller in Support ofPlaintiff's Offer of ProofRe: Novartis's Motion inLimine No. 4 | Entire document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 374 - GRANTED | |||
| Dkt. No. 375/(374-4) | Offer of Proof Relating toPlaintiff's Motion inLimine No. 1 | Page 10:3-27Page 11:1-21Page 12:19-21Page 13:3-18, 21-27Page 14:1-6, 8-9, 11-20,22-27Page 15:1, 3-4, 6-8Page 21:22-23Page 22:1-12, 14-26Page 23:3-4, 7, 9, 21-22,24-26Page 24:3, 5, 10, 19-22,24-26Page 25:1, 15-25Page 26:2-6, 8-25Page 27:1-4, 6-22, 26-28Page 35:11-27Page 36:1-26Page 37:1-13Page 50:23Page 51:1-6, 18-20 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarypharmaceuticalresearch anddevelopmentinformation. See Dkt.No. 377.) |
III. CONCLUSION
The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties' administrative motions to file under seal. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(1), documents filed under seal as to which the administrative motions are granted will remain under seal. The Court DIRECTS the parties to file public versions of all documents for which the proposed sealing has been denied, as indicated in the chart above, within seven days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/13/2020
/s/_________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge